Software: Apache/2.0.54 (Fedora). PHP/5.0.4 uname -a: Linux mina-info.me 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 11 22:57:02 EDT 2006 i686 uid=48(apache) gid=48(apache) groups=48(apache) Safe-mode: OFF (not secure) /usr/bin/X11/./../../share/doc/python-numeric-23.7/../samba-3.0.23a/htmldocs/Samba3-HOWTO/ drwxr-xr-x |
Viewing file: Select action/file-type: Table of Contents This is a rough guide to assist those wishing to migrate from NT4 domain control to Samba-3-based domain control. In the IT world there is often a saying that all problems are encountered because of poor planning. The corollary to this saying is that not all problems can be anticipated and planned for. Then again, good planning will anticipate most show-stopper-type situations. Those wishing to migrate from MS Windows NT4 domain control to a Samba-3 domain control environment would do well to develop a detailed migration plan. So here are a few pointers to help migration get underway. The key objective for most organizations is to make the migration from MS Windows NT4 to Samba-3 domain control as painless as possible. One of the challenges you may experience in your migration process may well be convincing management that the new environment should remain in place. Many who have introduced open source technologies have experienced pressure to return to a Microsoft-based platform solution at the first sign of trouble. Before attempting a migration to a Samba-3-controlled network, make every possible effort to gain all-round commitment to the change. Know precisely why the change is important for the organization. Possible motivations to make a change include:
Make sure everyone knows that Samba-3 is not MS Windows NT4. Samba-3 offers an alternative solution that is both different from MS Windows NT4 and offers advantages compared with it. Gain recognition that Samba-3 lacks many of the features that Microsoft has promoted as core values in migration from MS Windows NT4 to MS Windows 2000 and beyond (with or without Active Directory services). What are the features that Samba-3 cannot provide?
The features that Samba-3 does provide and that may be of compelling interest to your site include:
Before migrating a network from MS Windows NT4 to Samba-3, consider all necessary factors. Users should be educated about changes they may experience so the change will be a welcome one and not become an obstacle to the work they need to do. The following sections explain factors that will help ensure a successful migration. Samba-3 can be configured as a domain controller, a backup domain controller (probably best called a secondary controller), a domain member, or a standalone server. The Windows network security domain context should be sized and scoped before implementation. Particular attention needs to be paid to the location of the Primary Domain Controller (PDC) as well as backup controllers (BDCs). One way in which Samba-3 differs from Microsoft technology is that if one chooses to use an LDAP authentication backend, then the same database can be used by several different domains. In a complex organization, there can be a single LDAP database, which itself can be distributed (have a master server and multiple slave servers) that can simultaneously serve multiple domains. From a design perspective, the number of users per server as well as the number of servers per domain should be scaled taking into consideration server capacity and network bandwidth. A physical network segment may house several domains. Each may span multiple network segments. Where domains span routed network segments, consider and test the performance implications of the design and layout of a network. A centrally located domain controller that is designed to serve multiple routed network segments may result in severe performance problems. Check the response time (ping timing) between the remote segment and the PDC. If it's long (more than 100 ms), locate a BDC on the remote segment to serve as the local authentication and access control server. There are cardinal rules to effective network design that cannot be broken with impunity. The most important rule: Simplicity is king in every well-controlled network. Every part of the infrastructure must be managed; the more complex it is, the greater will be the demand of keeping systems secure and functional. Keep in mind the nature of how data must be shared. Physical disk space layout should be considered carefully. Some data must be backed up. The simpler the disk layout, the easier it will be to keep track of backup needs. Identify what backup media will meet your needs; consider backup to tape, CD-ROM or DVD-ROM, or other offline storage medium. Plan and implement for minimum maintenance. Leave nothing to chance in your design; above all, do not leave backups to chance: backup, test, and validate every backup; create a disaster recovery plan and prove that it works. Users should be grouped according to data access control needs. File and directory access is best controlled via group permissions, and the use of the “sticky bit” on group-controlled directories may substantially avoid file access complaints from Samba share users. Inexperienced network administrators often attempt elaborate techniques to set access controls on files, directories, shares, as well as in share definitions. Keep your design and implementation simple and document your design extensively. Have others audit your documentation. Do not create a complex mess that your successor will not understand. Remember, job security through complex design and implementation may cause loss of operations and downtime to users as the new administrator learns to untangle your knots. Keep access controls simple and effective, and make sure that users will never be interrupted by obtuse complexity. Logon scripts can help to ensure that all users gain the share and printer connections they need.
Logon scripts can be created on the fly so all commands executed are specific to the
rights and privileges granted to the user. The preferred controls should be effected through
group membership so group information can be used to create a custom logon script using
the root preexec parameters to the Some sites prefer to use a tool such as kixstart to establish a controlled user environment. In any case, you may wish to do a Google search for logon script process controls. In particular, you may wish to explore the use of the Microsoft Knowledge Base article KB189105 that deals with how to add printers without user intervention via the logon script process. User and group profiles may be migrated using the tools described in the section titled Desktop Profile Management.
Profiles may also be managed using the Samba-3 tool profiles. This tool allows the MS
Windows NT-style security identifiers (SIDs) that are stored inside the profile
It is possible to migrate all account settings from an MS Windows NT4 domain to Samba-3. Before attempting to migrate user and group accounts, you are STRONGLY advised to create in Samba-3 the groups that are present on the MS Windows NT4 domain AND to map them to suitable UNIX/Linux groups. By following this simple advice, all user and group attributes should migrate painlessly. The approximate migration process is described below. Procedure 36.1. The Account Migration Process
Migrate all the profiles, then migrate all policy files. Sites that wish to migrate from MS Windows NT4 domain control to a Samba-based solution generally fit into three basic categories. Following table shows the possibilities. Table 36.1. The Three Major Site Types
There are three basic choices for sites that intend to migrate from MS Windows NT4 to Samba-3:
Minimize downstream problems by:
Following table lists the conversion choices given the type of migration being contemplated. Table 36.2. Nature of the Conversion Choices
|
:: Command execute :: | |
--[ c99shell v. 1.0 pre-release build #16 powered by Captain Crunch Security Team | http://ccteam.ru | Generation time: 0.004 ]-- |